Legal Opinion

Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. Mullin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1939No. 32,078PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining defendant Mullin’s amended demurrer to its complaint.

The following facts are alleged in the complaint as amplified by further facts stipulated by counsel and approved by the court as within the cause: On January 30, 1929, one Henry J. Mullin borrowed $600 from plaintiff and executed a note due 60 days thereafter with interest at seven per cent. As security for its payment he also executed and delivered an assignment of all his “right, title, and interest as residuary legatee to the extent of” the amount of the note and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weston v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. State ex rel. Lindekugel v. Probate Court of Sibley CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Ganser v. GanserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Everett v. O'LearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Atwater v. Manchester Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gau v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. In re Hamburger Distillery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  3. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Mangos v. MangosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API