Legal Opinion
In Re the Trusteeship Created by the Sheridan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 5, 1999No. C6-98-1673, C9-98-1702 and C4-98-1722PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
In an appeal from the district court’s order in response to the trustee’s supplemental petition, trust beneficiaries challenge the court’s determinations that (1) it had jurisdiction over the trust, (2) the trust instrument gave the trustee the authority to sell a trust asset, and (3) the trustee did not breach its fiduciary duties. The beneficiaries also appeal from the district court’s approval of the trustee’s fees. We affirm the court’s determination that it had jurisdiction and that the trustee acted in accordance with the trust and did not breach its fiduciary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Great Lakes Carbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Doerr v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Mulcahy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Fleet National Bank v. HuntSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- Green Hills Development Company, LLC v. Oppenheimer Funds, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022