Legal Opinion
Jinadu v. Centrust Mortgage Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 1994No. C5-93-2164PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
The district court dismissed appellant Yisa Jinadu’s action against respondent CenTrust Mortgage Corporation for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Based on 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(13)(D) (Supp. II 1990), the court concluded it lacked jurisdiction because the Resolution Trust Corporation had been appointed as CenTrust Mortgage’s receiver for the purpose of liquidation before Jinadu began this action. We affirm.
FACTS
On June 28, 1990, the Office of Thrift Supervision appointed the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) as receiver for CenTrust Federal Savings Bank (CenTrust…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Serge Marquis v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidating Agent of Hillsborough Bank & Trust Company, Eltrex International Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidating Agent of Hillsborough Bank & Trust Company, Michael M. Mills v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Nashua Trust Company, James P. Goodrich v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Dartmouth BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Barbara Ronda Meliezer, Wife Of/and Karl A. Loetzerich v. Resolution Trust Company, as Receiver for Home Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Mountain Ridge State Bank, in Receivership v. Shain, Schaffer & RafanelloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Saffer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Rudebeck v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000