Legal Opinion

Bogestad v. Bothum

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 9, 1956No. 36,805PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

This is an action in replevin for the recovery of a Toro Zipper mowing machine, together with $35 damages for its alleged wrongful detention and $25 for its use. In his complaint plaintiff alleged that he was the owner of the mowing machine; that the defendant had wrongfully detained the same from June 1, 1951; and that demand for its return had been made on the defendant on September 15,1951. At the time of the commencement of the action, plaintiff took possession of the mowing machine under the provisional remedy of claim and delivery.

Defendant interposed an answer in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sherman v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. New England Furniture & Carpet Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Scott v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Cox v. SeloverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. French v. GinsburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Widgren v. MassieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Mangos v. MangosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Galioto Towing LLC v. The Huntington National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API