Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. First National Bank in Sioux Falls

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1986No. 14832PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

Harold and Colleen Schwartz (Schwartz) brought an action against First National Bank in Sioux Falls, South Dakota (Bank), alleging negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress and extreme and outrageous conduct. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Bank and Schwartz’ appeal. We affirm.

Pursuant to a judgment, see Midcontinent Broadcasting Co. v. AVA Corp. and Harold Schwartz, 329 N.W.2d 378 (S.D.1983), Midcontinent filed a levy on Schwartz’ business account (Sioux Falls Karmel Korn account) at Bank’s Western Mall Branch. On April 23, 1982, Minne-haha…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lackner v. LaCroixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Brown v. CarrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Weisman v. MiddletonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Baker v. JewellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Bank of Cumming v. MoseleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Specialty Mills, Inc. v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Manuel v. WilkaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Olson v. JuddSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Christensen v. QuinnDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
  5. Kaarup v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API