Legal Opinion
Manuel v. Wilka
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] After much litigation, including claims and counterclaims, Michael Manuel sued Michael Kenyon and Kenyon’s attorney, Timothy Wilka, for malicious prosecution. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] In July 1993, Michael Manuel heard water dripping , in two walls in his home. Upon inspection, he found that the water was coming through the roof around the south chimney. He determined that the cause of the leak and the water in his home was deterioration of the chimney chase, which is the exterior…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Roberts v. Federal Express Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Paint Brush Corp. v. NeuSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Specialty Mills, Inc. v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Setliff v. AkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Nickerson v. American States InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Phen v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Stratmeyer v. EngbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Johnson v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.