Legal Opinion

Brown v. Carr

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1986No. 84-230PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Chief Judge:

In this case, appellant Philip J. Brown brought suit against Oliver T. Carr, Jr. and two of his attorneys (appellees) alleging malicious prosecution and intentional interference with a prospective business advantage. Appellees filed a counterclaim, alleging that Brown’s suit in this case was commenced solely to force Carr to settle a separate case pending between the parties at the same time. The trial judge dismissed Brown’s malicious prosecution count before trial after finding, as a matter of law, that there had been no favorable termnation of the litigation on which the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Waldon v. CovingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Lackner v. LaCroixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Alfred A. Altimont, Inc. v. Chatelain, Samperton & NolanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Carr v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Whelan v. AbellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. Cordova v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. Kenley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. Casco Marina Development, L.L.C. v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land AgencyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API