Legal Opinion

Bank of Cumming v. Moseley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1979No. 34803PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

Harry and Ted Moseley sued appellant Bank of Cumming to force re-assignment to them of a third party note and security deed held by the bank as collateral for a loan to the brothers. When the bank failed to answer, the Moseleys obtained a default judgment. Within the same term of court, the trial judge set aside the default, but the bank still did not answer the complaint. Eleven months later, the bank attempted to foreclose on the third party note, alleging that Harry Moseley was in default on a subsequent loan secured by that note. The trial court temporarily enjoined the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ammons v. BolickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. Martin v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  3. Frost v. FrostSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Coleman v. Dairyland InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Times-Journal, Inc. v. Jonquil Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Martin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Bagley v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. Nunnally Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Vance v. Lomas Mortgage USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  5. Herringdine v. Nalley Equipment Leasing Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API