Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Quinn
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 10, 2014No. CIV. 10-4128-KESPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge.
Pending are motions for summary judgment by all defendants. Plaintiff, Daniel Reed Christensen, opposes each motion, and separately moves for summary judgment against defendants Humane Society of the United States, Wayne Pacelle, Scottlund Haisley, Dr. Dawn Dale, Dr. Adam Bauknecht, United Animal Nations, Tiffani Landeen-Hoeke, Rosie Quinn, Second Chance Rescue Center, Jim Severson, Lara Cunningham, and Jay Ostrem.
BACKGROUND
Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and…
2Cases cited127 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Isaac v. CrichlowSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Dakota Provisions, LLC v. Hillshire Brands Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2016
- Cronin v. PetersonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2018
- Hermanek-Peck v. SprySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Abdulrazzak v. WarembourgDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.