Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Baker v. Jewell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1959No. File 9698PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRentto, J.

On or about December 4, 1956, the plaintiff Trailer Mart sold a house trailer to Mr. and Mrs. Jewell, the defendants above named, under a conditional sale contract. They made the down payment and three required monthly payments, after which they notified the Trailer Mart in writing that they had rescinded the contract because of breach of warranties. The Trailer Mart then instituted this action to recover possession of the property involved.

By their responsive pleading the Jewells claimed that the trailer house was not as represented and warranted and asked that they be given judgment in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HouckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Allen v. McLainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Farmers' Elevator Co. v. SwierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Swasey v. De L'EtancheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Morgan v. BaldwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Cromwell v. HosbrookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Aschoff v. Mobil Oil Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Sabbagh v. Professional & Business Men's Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API