Legal Opinion
Maddox v. Andy's Refrigeration & Motor Service Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 24, 1960No. 2541PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
The question presented on this appeal is whether appellant’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations. 1 The trial court, in granting appellee’s motion to dismiss, held that it was.
Appellant filed his complaint on August 13, 1959. 2 An amended complaint was filed on September 15, 1959. It consisted of two counts, the first for breach of contract, and the second for fraud. 3 From the complaint, the following essential facts emerge:
On April 10, 1956, appellant contracted with appellee for the repair of his refrigerator. When the work was completed, the refrigerator…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wiren v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Poole v. Terminix Co. Of Maryland and Washington, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Poole v. Terminix Co. of Maryland & Washington, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- White v. Piano Mart, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Viola B. Page v. Sophie ComertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
3Cited by8 opinions
- William J. Davis, Inc. v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- King v. Kitchen Magic, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Sears, Roebuck and Company v. GoudieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Grigsby v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Doolin v. Environmental Power Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.