King v. Kitchen Magic, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of appellees (defendants below). We conclude that the trial court erroneously ruled that the entire action was barred by the statute of limitations. Accordingly, we set aside the ruling of the trial court in part, and remand the case with instructions to rule on appellees’ motion for summary judgment in accordance with the principles enunciated in this opinion. *
On July 14,1967, appellants, Walter King and his wife, signed a contract with Kitchen Magic, Inc. The contract provided for the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Russell v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Dollar v. Land, Chairman, United States Maritime CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Roland Riddell v. Riddell Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Johnson v. Fairfax Village Condominium IV Unit Owners Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- William J. Davis, Inc. v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bailey v. GreenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- C & E SERVICES, INC. v. Ashland, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.