White v. Piano Mart, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, asks us to reverse an order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment on the ground that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations.1 The complaint alleged the following facts: Plaintiff had been induced to purchase a used piano from defendant on the representation that it had been completely rebuilt and that all defective parts had been replaced. After payment and delivery, plaintiff discovered that the piano had a defective pin block that required replacement. It was alleged that this was a hidden defect which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kraft v. LoweDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Zellan v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- P. H. Sheehy Co. v. Eastern Importing & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915
- Cole v. ZellanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Johnson v. TaylorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947
3Cited by6 opinions
- King v. Kitchen Magic, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Maddox v. Andy's Refrigeration & Motor Service Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Diamond v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Diamond v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Diamond v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.