Legal Opinion
Viola B. Page v. Sophie Comert
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 17, 1957No. 13193_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Circuit Judge.
The District Court dismissed appellant’s amended complaint. We find the order of dismissal proper in all respects, save as to Count II insofar as it is brought against appellees Augie C. Ur-ciolo and J. John Urciolo. As to them, we think, it'cannot be said, as the District Court’s order does, that Count II does “not state a cause of action.”
Count II is denominated “Claim for damages — fraud, deceit, misrepresentations.” It alleges that (1) appellant was “unskilled” in real estate matters and therefore relied wholly upon the direction, advice and representations of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Wiren v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Brady v. GamesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jean v. US Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Maddox v. Andy's Refrigeration & Motor Service Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Merchant v. DaviesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Merchant v. DaviesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957