Legal Opinion

William J. Davis, Inc. v. Young

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1980No. 12363PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

We are asked to find that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motions for partial summary judgment. Appellant corporation alleges that a portion of appel-lee’s minimum wage claim is barred by the statute of limitations. 1 It also suggests that a claim for 1972 wages is barred, under the principle of res judicata, by an earlier determination of the Minimum Wage Board. We disagree and accordingly affirm. 2

The claim arose under the District of Columbia’s Minimum Wage Act of 1966. 3 In January 1972, appellant William J. Davis, Inc. (Davis, Inc.) hired Mr. Young,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Hobson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Robert James Richards v. Milton Stanley Mileski (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. Kuwait Airways Corporation v. American Security Bank, N.A. And First American Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. State v. BrabsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API