Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Susman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2002No. 522, Disciplinary Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2002, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 4, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that GERALD S. SUSMAN, be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three (3) years, retroactive to May 10, 1999, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

*303Justice SAYLOR dissents, as he would impose a five-year suspension as recommended by dissenting Board Member…

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re SusmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API