Legal Opinion
M.K. v. Tenet
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 23, 2000No. CIV.A. 99-0095 (RMU), Doc. No. 18PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
I. Introduction
Eight employees of the CIA brought an as-yet-uncertified class action against the CIA, CIA Director George Tenet, and thirty unnamed “John and Jane Does” (collectively “the CIA”). The plaintiffs allege that the CIA violated their constitutional rights to “liberty, due process, access to the courts and to receive effective assistance of counsel under the First, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments” and violated the Privacy Act. (Am.Compl.lHI 103, 107, 115-120) The…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hilska v. JonesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Runkle v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Bates v. Northwestern Human Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- M.K. v. TenetDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Virtual Defense & Development International, Inc. v. Republic of MoldovaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.