Legal Opinion
M.K. v. Tenet
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 30, 2002No. CIV.A. 99-0095(RMU)PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*135 MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint; Denying the Defendants’ Motion to Sever
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Employees of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”) brought this as-yet-uncertified class action against that agency, that agency’s director, George Tenet, and 30 unnamed “John and Jane Does” (collectively “the defendants”). In a four-count amended complaint, six plaintiffs allege that the CIA violated the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (“Privacy Act”), and several of their constitutional rights. In a proposed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Montgomery v. STG International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Disparte v. Corporate Executive BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Call of the Wild Movie, LLC v. DOES 1-1,062District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Spaeth v. Michigan State University College of LawDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Bederson v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.