Legal Opinion

Hilska v. Jones

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 11, 2003No. Civil Action No. 02-1042 (RMU)PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Denying Defendant Jones’s Motion to Dismiss; Directing the Plaintiff to Perfect Service on Defendant Jones and Foreign Defendant Sané; Granting the Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss as to Federal Defendant Du-FRENSE BUT DENYING THE MOTION AS TO the Other Federal Defendants; Granting the Federal Defendants’ Alternative Motion for a More Definite Statement; and Directing the Plaintiff to Clarify the Jurisdictional Grounds as Related to the Foreign Defendants

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on certain defendants’ motions to dismiss…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  5. Jarrell v. TischDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. McManus v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. Cruz-Packer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  3. Lindsey v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  4. Cheeks v. Fort Myer Construction CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API