Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Ealey
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 1945No. Civ. No. 7102PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
The plaintiffs are the surviving wife and daughter, respectively, of W. W. Davidson, who was killed as the result of a collision on January 5, 1941, between the automobile he was driving and an automobile owned by the defendant, Tom Ealey, which was then being driven by one Nelson. By stipulation of counsel at the time of the trial it was agreed that as a result of the negligence of Nelson, Davidson was killed, and that if defendant Ealey was found to be liable, any damage suffered by the plaintiffs would exceed the statutory amount of $5,000 as provided in section 402 of the Vehicle Code.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Burgess v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Sutton v. TangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Consolidated FreightwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Kisch v. SkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Barcus v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Scollan v. Government Employees InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.