H & H Development, LLC v. Ramlow
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris
¶1 H&H Development (H&H) and David House appeal the order from the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, granting summary judgment to Jim Ramlow (Ramlow), his former law firm, Kaufman, Vidal, Hileman P.C., and his current law firm, Ramlow & Rudbach PLLP (collectively ‘Firms”). We reverse and remand.
¶2 We review the following issue on appeal:
¶3 Did the District Court properly grant summary judgment to Ramlow and the Firm based upon its determination that H&H’s pro se 2007 complaint constituted a nullity and that H&H’s later amended complaints were time-barred?
FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Becker v. ROSEBUD OPERATING SERVICES, INC.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
- Old Hickory Engineering & MacHine Co. v. HenryTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Prentice Lumber Co. v. HukillMontana Supreme Court · 1972
- Weaver Ex Rel. Weaver-Maxwell, Inc. v. Law Firm of Graybill, Ostrem, Warner & CrottyMontana Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Leslie Jon ClaassenMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Smith v. Rustic Home Builders, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Seamster v. Musselshell County Sheriffs OfficeMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Flathead Bank of Bigfork v. Masonry by Muller, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
- Sagorin v. Sunrise HeatingMontana Supreme Court · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.