Legal Opinion
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 30, 2008No. A06-1693PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND DISSENT1
PAGE, Justice.
Appellant Judy Frieler (Frieler) sued respondent Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. (CMG), in 2006 for violating the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), MinmStat. §§ 363A.03, subd. 43, and 363A.08, subd. 2 (2006), based on a hostile working environment due to sexual harassment by a supervisor, and for assault and battery. The district court granted CMG’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that Frieler failed to raise an issue of material fact regarding whether: (1) CMG knew or should have known about the supervisor’s harassment; (2) the supervisor was…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- John Goodpaster v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc. and Todd Swanson, Individually and in His Corporate CapacitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Linda Pippen, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.