Legal Opinion
Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones Y Valores
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 24, 1985No. 84-1184PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
476 So.2d 247 (1985)
Victor SZTEINBAUM and Bella Szteinbaum, Appellants,
v.
KAES INVERSIONES y VALORES, C.A., Appellee.
No. 84-1184.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
September 24, 1985.
Lisa Bennett and Richard Bennett, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Simson Unterberger, Tampa, for appellee.
Before DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.
The question on this appeal is whether a complaint filed by a non-attorney on behalf of a corporation may be amended to cure this deficiency. We decide that such a complaint may be amended and affirm the order under…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Union Savings Ass'n v. Home Owners Aid, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Niklaus v. Abel Construction CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Nicholson Supply Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Hardee CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Alvarez v. DeAguirreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Downtown Disposal Services, Inc. v. The City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
- Shenandoah Sales & Service, Inc. v. Assessor of Jefferson CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
- CLD Construction, Inc. v. City of San RamonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Sullivan v. Ajax Navigation Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.