Legal Opinion
Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. Steinberg
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 5, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-4323 (AJL)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action by plaintiff Gruntal & Co., Inc. (“Gruntal”) against defendants Ronald Steinberg and Carolyn Steinberg (the “Stein-bergs”), for declaratory judgment as to Gruntal’s obligation to arbitrate and a permanent injunction against arbitration. Jurisdiction is alleged pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq., and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332.
By opinion and order, filed 12 October 1993, an application by Gruntal for a preliminary injunction against arbitration was granted (the “Preliminary Injunction”). See Gruntal & Co., Inc. v.…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Ryan, Beck & Co., LLC. v. FakihDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Samaritan Center v. Borough of EnglishtownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Kennamer v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.