Legal Opinion

Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. Ross

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 22, 1997No. 1960389PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Some documents in the record refer to the plaintiff as "Bernette B. Ross"; other documents refer to the plaintiff as "Bernetta B. Ross."

This arbitration case arises out of Bernette Ross's purchase of an automobile, sold to her by Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. ("Jim Burke"), and financed by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation ("Nissan"). Ross sued Jim Burke and Nissan, alleging, among other things, fraud. Jim Burke and Nissan moved to stay the proceeding below and to compel arbitration. The trial court granted Jim Burke's motion to compel arbitration, but denied Nissan's motion. Nissan…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. AG Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Chatham Shipping Company, Warwick Corporation and Tsakalotos Navigation Corp., Libelants-Appellees v. Fertex Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  5. Dominex, Inc. v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Winkleblack v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Ryan's Family Steak Houses, Inc. v. RegelinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS LIFE INS. v. DuttonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Jack Ingram Motors, Inc. v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API