Legal Opinion
Kennamer v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 28, 2014No. 1120689PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOLIN, Justice.
Paul Kennamer and Dorothy Kennamer appeal an order entered by the Marshall Circuit Court compelling them to arbitrate their claims against Ford Motor Credit Company LLC (hereinafter “Ford Credit”) and Ray Pearman Lincoln, Inc. (hereinafter “the dealership”).
Facts and Procedural History
On November 7, 2009, the Kennamers purchased a used automobile from the dealership. As part of their purchase, the Kennamers entered into a retail-installment contract -with the dealership, which the dealership subsequently assigned to Ford Credit. The installment contract contained an arbitration…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Morewitz v. West of England Ship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (Luxembourg)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eric Anderton and Jackson Key Practice Solutions, LLC v. The Practice-Monroeville, P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
- Sanders v. Savannah Highway AutomotiveCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
- Sanders v. Savannah Highway Automotive CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023