Attorney Grievance Commission v. Marcalus
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“AGC”), acting through Bar Counsel, petitioned this Court for disbarment of Respondent, attorney Jeffrey S. Marcalus. The AGC alleged that Marcalus had violated Rules 8.4(b), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.1 The Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County concluded that Marcalus had violated Rules 8.4(b) and 8.4(d). We agree with the Circuit Court, but find that Marcalus’s actions do not warrant disbarment. We will instead suspend Marcalus from the practice of law in Maryland for sixty days, with the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Hadder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Attorney Grievance v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- In re KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. LangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.