Legal Opinion
Nielsen v. Board of Appeals on Zoning
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 16, 1942PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The city of Bridgeport has a zoning regulation which provides that “no building or premises shall be used ... for the sale of alcoholic liquor . . . if any entrance to such building or premises shall be within fifteen hundred feet in a direct line from the entrance to any other building or premises which shall be used for the sale of alcoholic liquor under any tavern, restaurant, druggist or all alcoholic liquor package store permit.”
On March 7, 1941, William Poulos and Thomas Laliotis made application to the board of appeals on zoning of the city of Bridgeport to “vary the fifteen hundred…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- St. Patrick's Church Corporation v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Chudnov v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Holley v. SunderlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Gallup v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Winslow v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Jack v. TorrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Morningside Assn. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.