Legal Opinion
Jack v. Torrant
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 21, 1950PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
These two cases were tried together. In the first, the plaintiffs sought to enjoin the defendants from using their property as an embalming and undertaking establishment, alleging in the first count that this use was violative of applicable zoning regulations, and in the second that it constituted a nuisance. In the second action, the plaintiff zoning commission sought similar injunctive relief against the defendants’ violation of the zoning regulations. The court granted a permanent injunction against the defendants in each case and they have appealed from both judgments.
The attack on the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Saier v. JoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Paola & Fall River Railway Co. v. Comm'rs of Anderson CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Armstrong v. LeveroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Nailor v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Couch v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- International Business MacHines Corporation v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Keeney v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Pepe v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Morningside Assn. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.