Legal Opinion
Holley v. Sunderland
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 4, 1929PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
Holley’s appeal is from the denial of his application for a certificate of approval of a location for the sale of gasoline and other motor-vehicle products as provided for by Chapter 245 of the Public Acts of 1927. His appeal alleges that the location is a suitable one for such purposes and conforms in all respects to the requirements of law, that he is aggrieved by the denial of his application, and that in denying him such certificate of approval the mayor exceeded and abused the power and authority vested in him and acted arbitrarily and illegally and has deprived him of the right to use…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Deflumeri v. SunderlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Moynihan's Appeal From County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Commissioner of Banks v. Prudential Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Hopson's Appeal from County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Burns' AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- St. Patrick's Church Corporation v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.