Legal Opinion

Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 18, 2002No. 192,2002PublishedCited by 676 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

In this appeal, we consider whether a complaint seeking relief for misappropriation of trade secrets adequately states a claim. The Superior Court dismissed appellant’s third amended complaint, finding that it contained only generalities and con-clusory allegations that failed to identify a trade secret. Although the complaint does not describe the purported trade secret in detail, we are satisfied that it meets the minimal standards governing notice pleading. Accordingly, we reverse.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 1994, Savor, Inc. developed what it claims was a unique…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ramunno v. CawleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  2. Kofron v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Precision Air, Inc. v. Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals Co. v. Merck & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2000

3Cited by676 opinions

  1. Central Mortgage Co. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  2. VLIW TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  3. In Re General Motors (Hughes) Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. Abry Partners V, L.P. v. F & W Acquisition LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  5. Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018

671 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API