Legal Opinion

SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals Co. v. Merck & Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 1, 2000No. 403, 1999PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Court of Chancery following trial in an action between two pharmaceutical companies for misappropriation of trade secrets relating to a commercial process for producing chicken pox vaccine. The Court of Chancery determined that a misappropriation had occurred. The defendant argues on appeal that the Court of Chancery erred in its finding of misappropriation and in its application of the unclean hands doctrine and the statute of limitations. We find no error in the Court of Chancery’s rulings and accordingly affirm.

I

We draw upon the Court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  4. Nakahara v. NS 1991 American TrustCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
  5. Collins v. BurkeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. AIG Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  3. Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  4. RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. JervisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  5. Krahmer v. Christie's Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API