Legal Opinion

Kofron v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 6, 1982PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNEILLY, Justice:

We here consider two appeals from decisions of the Superior Court which require us to determine the scope of coverage of the Delaware Workmen’s Compensation Law. In both cases plaintiffs instituted common law causes of action based, respectively, on claims of gross negligence and intentional tort against defendants, their former or present employers, and a number of other corporations, engaged in the manufacturing of asbestos. In this opinion, however, we are concerned only with the allegations made against Amoco and duPont. The Superior Court granted defendants’ motions to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Diamond State Telephone Co. v. University of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  2. Gallegher v. DavisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
  3. Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  4. Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  5. Kittell v. Vermont Weatherboard, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  2. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. VLIW TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  4. Malone v. BrincatSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  5. Reed Tool Co. v. CopelinTexas Supreme Court · 1985

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API