Legal Opinion
Precision Air, Inc. v. Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided February 9, 1995No. 335, 1994PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
In this interlocutory appeal we consider the contention of third-party defendant be-Iow-appellant Precision Air, Inc. (“Precision”) that the Superior Court erred in denying its motion to dismiss a third-party complaint filed by defendant/third-party plaintiff below-appellee Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc. (“Standard”). This ease requires us to decide whether the workers’ compensation statute, 19 Del.C. § 2304 (“Section 2304”), 1 bars Standard from impleading Precision, an employer that has paid workmen’s compensation benefits, into a negligence suit brought by an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Kofron v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Diamond State Telephone Co. v. University of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Blackshear v. ClarkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- VLIW TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Ramunno v. CawleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Malone v. BrincatSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Solomon v. Pathe Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.