Legal Opinion

Ramunno v. Cawley

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 22, 1998No. 530, 1996PublishedCited by 310 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal we reverse, in large part, the decision of the Superior Court to dismiss the complaint under Superior Court Civil Rule 12(b)(6). The complaint asserted claims for libel and civil conspiracy against both media and non-media defendants. We rest our decision solely on pleading rules. A dismissal under Ride 12(b)(6) is proper only where the complaint, construed most favorably to the plaintiff, fails as a matter of law to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The trial court’s dismissal here does not meet that test.

Facts 1

MBNA America Bank, N.A.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert NovakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Spence v. FunkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by310 opinions

  1. Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  2. Kuroda v. SPJS Holdings, L.L.C.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
  3. Doe v. CahillSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  4. Lord v. SouderSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  5. Cincinnati SMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Cincinnati Bell Cellular Systems Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998

305 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API