Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sawyer v. O'Connor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1978No. 77-390PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

The charge against Brandenburg of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol was properly before the Hamilton County Municipal Court. In relation to that charge, the defendant may pleiad no contest with consent of the court. Crim. E. 11(A). In'that event,'Crim. E. 11(B)(2)' provides as follows:

“The plea' of no contest is not an admission of de*382fendant’s guilt, but is an admission of the truth of the facts alleged in the indictment, information, or complaint and such plea or admission shall not be used against the defendant in any subsequent civil or criminal proceeding.”

Both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. City of Euclid v. HeatonOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State ex rel. Freeman v. ValentineOhio Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ney v. NiehausOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Butler v. DemisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. White v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API