Legal Opinion

City of Euclid v. Heaton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1968No. Nos. 41178, 41193, 41194 and 41228PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

In each of the two Dodge cases, it will be observed immediately that the Prosecuting Attorney initially raised no objection to the form or substance of the plea. Neither in the Court of Appeals nor in this court did he advance any argument directed to the merits of his dissatisfaction with the disposition of cause No. 41193 (indictment for murder in the first degree of defendant’s mother-in-law) by the three-judge court, confining his argument solely to the constitutionality of the so-called prosecutor’s appeal.

In cause No. 41194, he appealed only from the order of the trial court refusing to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Greenhills Home Owners Corp. v. Village of GreenhillsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. United States v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. State v. HutterNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State v. KennedyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. DodgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. City of Cuyahoga Falls v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of South Euclid v. JemisonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Henry v. Central National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. MeekerOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1970

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API