Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ney v. Niehaus

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1987No. 86-1373PublishedCited by 142 opinions

1Per curiam

Mandamus should issue in this case only if appellant shows (1) that appellant has a clear legal right to the relief requested; (2) that appellee is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act; and (3) that appel*119lant has no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State, ex rel. Middletown Bd. of Edn., v. Butler Cty. Budget Comm. (1987), 31 Ohio St. 3d 251, 253, 31 OBR 455, 456, 510 N.E. 2d 383, 384, citing State, ex rel. Westchester, v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 42, 15 O.O. 3d 53, 399 N.E. 2d 81, paragraph one of the syllabus. Appellant argues that this court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Butler v. DemisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Sawyer v. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State ex rel. Board of Education v. Butler County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. FryeOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cincinnati Entertainment Associates, Ltd. v. Hamilton County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. AsherOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API