Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 4, 1977No. 76-120PublishedCited by 1,393 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

A “hopelessly deadlocked” jury was discharged when unable to agree upon a verdict at the criminal contempt trial of respondent corporations in the District Court for the Western District of Texas.1 Federal Rule Crim. Proc. 29 (c) provides *566that in such case “a motion for judgment of acquittal may be made . . . within 7 days after the jury is discharged [and] the court may enter judgment of acquittal. . . .”2 Timely motions for judgments of acquittal under the Rule made by respondents six days after the discharge of the jury resulted two months later in the entry by the District Court of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,393 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

1,388 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API