Legal Opinion

State ex rel. White v. Franklin County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1992No. 92-1809PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

Relators argue that the Secretary of State and board of elections abused their discretion and disregarded the law, such that writs of prohibition and mandamus should issue to overturn their decisions, which are otherwise final. State ex rel. Higgins v. Brown (1960), 170 Ohio St. 511, 11 O.O.2d 322, 166 N.E.2d 759, paragraph two of the syllabus; State ex rel. Senn v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1977), 51 Ohio St.2d 173, 175, 5 O.O.3d 381, 382, 367 N.E.2d 879, 880; State ex rel. Shumate v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 12, 14, 591 N.E.2d 1194, 1196. With *47respect to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Stromberg v. Bd. of Edn. of BratenahlOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Burns v. WiltseNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kniskern v. Township of SomerfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga County BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Ascani v. Stark County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Licking County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API