Connors v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiffs, who are the surviving widow and minor children of Charles E. Connors, have appealed from a judgment of nonsuit which was granted at the close of their evidence. Mr. Connors, who was driving *874a truck loaded with fruit on the public highway in the nighttime, was instantly killed as the result of colliding with a Southern Pacific railway train which was crossing the highway on a spur track near Tracy. The appellants assert that the crossing is hazardous and inadequately lighted and that no adequate warning of the passing of the train was given.
We are convinced the court erred in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Jones v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Alloggi v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adams v. HermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Finkle v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
- Karstensen v. Western Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.