Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Leonard v. Watsonville Community Hospital

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1956No. S. F. 19485Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CARTER, J.—Concurring and Dissenting.

The holding of the majority opinion may be epitomized as follows: An inference of negligence which arises from testimony of adverse witnesses examined under section 2055 of the Code of Civil Procedure may be dispelled by such testimony even though plaintiff is not bound thereby and is entitled to rely upon all of such testimony which is favorable to her and disregard all that is unfavorable. The unsoundness of this holding is so obvious that the mere statement of it should disclose its absurdity. It is not only directly in conflict with the statutory law…

2Cases cited112 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API