Legal Opinion

LaFont v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 25, 1989No. 37-89CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Senior Judge:

Plaintiff, an oyster grower, seeks to recover damages, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1497 (1982),1 arising from dredging operations by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). The Corps had contracted to improve and maintain the navigability of the Barataría Bay Waterway in the State of Louisiana. During the course of contract performance plaintiff’s leased oyster beds were allegedly damaged and/or destroyed.

Defendant has moved for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that plaintiff’s damage claim is barred by the statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ingrum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Edwards v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. Leeth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  4. Cleek Aviation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Ingrum v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API