Cleek Aviation v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
This case is before the court on the plaintiff’s Motion to Correct Date of Filing. Plaintiff’s notice of appeal reached this court one day after the filing deadline. Plaintiff, Cleek Aviation (“Cleek”), argues that under RUSCC 3(b)(2)(C) this court should grant plaintiff’s motion to correct the records showing September 11, 1990 as the date of filing for plaintiff’s notice of appeal now dated as filed on September 12, 1990. Defendant, the United States, ar*261gues that RUSCC 3(b)(2)(C) is inapplicable and that plaintiff fails to demonstrate excusable neglect for its failure…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re Leasing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Reinsurance Company of America, Inc. v. Administratia Asigurarilor De Stat (Administration of State Insurance)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Elmer Gerard Pratt v. D.J. McCarthy SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Nichols-Morris Corporation v. Robert E. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ciaccio v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
- Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Dodson v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Advance America Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995