Legal Opinion
Ingrum v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 28, 2008No. 07-12LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Plaintiff, Robert Ingram, brings this takings suit under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution seeking $324,000 in compensation for the Government’s removal of fill material from his property. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss the action as time-barred under the six-year statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. § 2501.
The alleged taking resulted in a 20-foot high, 35,000 square-foot pit on Plaintiffs undeveloped 3,300 acre property in rural Texas. The parties agree for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ingrum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Uniglobe General Trading & Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Ross-Hime Designs, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018