Leeth v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge:
This case is before the court after a trial of the liability issue and the filing of post-trial briefs by the parties. The amended complaint alleges a taking of plaintiffs’ property under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as a result of flooding of plaintiffs’ land allegedly caused by the backwater effect of the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir at Warsaw, Missouri. Plaintiffs seek damages of $73,000 plus attorneys fees, interest and costs. For the reasons which follow the complaint will be ordered dismissed.
Factual Background
The plaintiffs in this suit are…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ware v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Hardwick Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- L.E. Cooke Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- St. Bernard Parish Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.