Legal Opinion

Leeth v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 31, 1991No. 569-88LPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBINSON, Judge:

This case is before the court after a trial of the liability issue and the filing of post-trial briefs by the parties. The amended complaint alleges a taking of plaintiffs’ property under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as a result of flooding of plaintiffs’ land allegedly caused by the backwater effect of the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir at Warsaw, Missouri. Plaintiffs seek damages of $73,000 plus attorneys fees, interest and costs. For the reasons which follow the complaint will be ordered dismissed.

Factual Background

The plaintiffs in this suit are…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ware v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. Hardwick Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  3. Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. L.E. Cooke Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. St. Bernard Parish Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API