Legal Opinion
Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment Agency
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided May 2, 1969No. 647-AppealPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaolino, J.
The plaintiffs, Samuel Corrado and his wife Dorothy Corrado, are the owners of real estate located at 312-314 South Main Street, in the city of Providence, within an area designated by the Providence Redevelopment Agency as “East Side Renewal Project No. R. I. R-4.” This action, which was commenced by complaint filed on November 8, 1968, is against the Providence Redevelopment Agency and the city of Providence. The plaintiffs, who are taxpayers in the city of Providence, seek to enjoin the agency from taking their property by eminent domain and from entering into a contract with a redeveloper…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mello v. Board of Review of NewportSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962
- Dodge v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Opinion to the GovernorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- Paiva v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
- Corrado v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
- Woonsocket Historical Society v. City of WoonsocketSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.