Legal Opinion

Corrado v. City of Providence

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 29, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Once again Samuel Corrado and his wife are in court on alleged grievances stemming from the inclusion of their property within the East Side Renewal *692Project No. R. I. R-4.1 This time they instituted a civil action in the Superior Court on July 24, 1972, and named the city of Providence and various of its officials as the defendants. They challenge and seek to enjoin the city’s abandonment of seven streets or alleys, two of which abut property located within the renewal area that was acquired from the Corrados by the Providence Redevelopment Agency by eminent domain. The case comes to us on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McAuslan v. McAuslanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1912
  2. Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  3. Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  4. Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  5. Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Old Cedar Development Corp. v. Jack Parker Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Amaral v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National BankSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API