Legal Opinion
Paiva v. Providence Redevelopment Agency
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided April 26, 1976No. 74-212-AppealPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaolino, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order entered in the Superior Court denying and dismissing his complaint on the ground that he failed to file his complaint in this matter within the 30 days allowed by statute. General Laws 1956 (1970 Reenactment) §45-32-22.
In June 1966, plaintiff became the owner of certain nonresidential premises located on South Main Street in the city of Providence. The land contains two buildings; one is a garage and the other is characterized by plaintiff as being “of historic nature.” The property was located within the so-called East Side Renewal Project…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- M. S. Alper & Son, Inc. v. Director of Public WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
- Trager v. Peabody Redevelopment AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1973
- Golden Gate Corporation v. SullivanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rhode Island Economic Development Corp. v. Parking Co. L.P.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- E & J Inc. v. Redevelopment Ag. of WoonsocketSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- D'AGOSTINO v. DoorleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Woonsocket Historical Society v. City of WoonsocketSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Providence Pub. Bldg. Auth. v. MitolaSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2009