Legal Opinion

Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment Agency

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 5, 1974No. 1952-AppealPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoslin, J.

This is one of several chapters — and hopefully one of the last — in the litigation between Samuel Corrado and his wife Dorothy, as plaintiffs, and the Providence Redevelopment Agency (redevelopment agency) and the treasurer of the city of Providence, as defendants. At the root of the litigation are the Corrados’ attempts to prevent the redevelopment agency from taking their property under the eminent domain power. A proper introduction to the current chapter requires at least a capsulized chronology of the significant prior proceedings.

In 1966 the Providence City Council adopted and approved…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Robert T. Mathis, Sr. v. The Hon. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of the Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Perez v. Pawtucket Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  4. Wells v. RockefellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Cain v. Union Central Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Julia Eliza Griffin v. State of Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. Westcott Construction Corp. v. Firemen's Fund of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Hebert v. VentetuoloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  4. Mulholland Construction Co. v. Lee Pare & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  5. Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API